Urbana, Illinois Natural Systems Quantified

Quantified Systems.
Engineered Confidence.

NSQ is a geotechnical and geostructural research and methods consultancy focused on the quantification of natural systems. We develop the methods, models, and technologies that improve how subsurface variability (in soils, groundwater, slopes, and the structures built upon them) is characterized and accounted for in geotechnical and infrastructure decisions.

Soils
Characterization & variability
Groundwater
Seepage & pore pressure
Slopes
Stability & movement
Structures
Retention & performance
Approach

Three disciplines, one workflow.

01
Measure

Instrumentation and monitoring

Field and laboratory characterization of subsurface conditions (in-situ testing, remote and proximal sensing) scoped to the parameters that drive the decisions downstream.

02
Model

Analysis and calibration

Numerical, statistical, and geospatial frameworks that treat natural variability as information rather than error. Probabilistic and reliability-based approaches calibrated against measured performance.

03
Transfer

Protocols and transfer

Specifications, QA/QC protocols, data-management systems, and decision-support tools: the deliverables that carry a method from calibration into routine use.

Focus areas

Where we concentrate.

Our work centers on subsurface characterization, slope behavior and stability, and MSE wall performance; supported by groundwater and seepage modeling, foundation characterization, soil stabilization evaluation, and the geotechnical data systems and reliability-based methods that carry results into practice.

Discuss a project or collaboration.

Contact us
Mission

A discipline of measurement, applied to the ground we build on.

NSQ develops the techniques and frameworks that improve how natural systems are characterized and accounted for in geotechnical and geostructural work.

Statement

NSQ was founded on a conviction that natural systems can be quantified; they obey physical law, they can be instrumented, and their behavior can be described with the same rigor applied to concrete or steel. The firm exists to advance the methods by which that work is done.

Geotechnical and geostructural work sits at the interface where natural variability becomes a quantification problem. Traditional approaches manage that variability through conservatism: factors of safety, empirical correlations, and assumed parameters applied across heterogeneous ground. That approach is safe, and it is expensive. It leaves performance on the table and it leaves risk unquantified.

Our work is to develop the methods, models, and technologies that close the gap: characterizing soil, groundwater, slope, and vegetation behavior directly, and calibrating analytical methods against measured performance. The results are translated into protocols, specifications, and frameworks the broader profession can adopt. Less ground taken on faith. More ground taken on evidence.

Our work serves state transportation agencies, federal research programs, universities, dam and levee owners, and licensed engineering firms who engage us for methods development and technical research. Our deliverables are technical reports, specifications, protocols, and tools: the infrastructure of better methods.

Principles

Four operating principles.

I.

Measurement first.

Where a parameter governs a decision, we work to measure it. Assumption is reserved for what cannot reasonably be measured, and is stated as such.

II.

Variability is information.

Natural heterogeneity is not a nuisance to be averaged away. It is a property of the system to be modeled, reported, and used to inform the analysis.

III.

Results carry their uncertainty.

Every method, every number, every recommendation is delivered with the statement of confidence that earned it. Transferability depends on it.

IV.

The ground sets the scope.

Methods are matched to site conditions, not the other way around. A method that works in the lab is not a method until it works in the field.

Capabilities

Areas of capability.

Three capability areas, a toolset, and the clients we work with. Most engagements draw from more than one area.

Introduction

Our work is organized around the quantification of natural systems (the soils, groundwater, and slopes whose behavior governs geotechnical and geostructural performance) and the translation of that quantification into methods and tools the profession can use.

Area

Methods & Models

Analytical and numerical methods for characterizing subsurface behavior (soil variability, stability, and seepage) developed, calibrated, and documented for use in practice.

  • 01.1Soil characterization and classification methods
  • 01.2Slope stability modeling (LEM, FEM)
  • 01.3Groundwater, seepage, and pore-pressure modeling
  • 01.4Probabilistic and reliability-based analysis
  • 01.5Soil stabilization evaluation and comparison
  • 01.6Spatial variability modeling (geostatistics)
  • 01.7Machine learning for subsurface prediction
  • 01.8Calibration against measured performance
Area

Instrumentation & Monitoring

Field instrumentation, data collection protocols, and long-term performance monitoring: for instrumented test beds, technology demonstration, and validation of analytical methods.

  • 02.1MSE wall instrumentation
  • 02.2Earth retention performance monitoring
  • 02.3Embankment and slope instrumentation
  • 02.4Remote sensing and UAV photogrammetry
  • 02.5In-situ testing protocol development
  • 02.6Instrumented test beds and demonstration sites
  • 02.7Data acquisition and QA/QC protocols
Area

Frameworks & Tools

Software, data systems, specifications, and decision-support tools that carry methods into routine use: the deliverables that make a technique adoptable.

  • 03.1Geotechnical data management systems
  • 03.2DIGGS-compliant data infrastructure
  • 03.3GIS-based spatial analysis platforms
  • 03.4Specification language and QC protocols
  • 03.5Decision-support dashboards
  • 03.6Digital twins and 3D subsurface visualization
  • 03.7Climate-resilience planning frameworks
  • 03.8Lifecycle and risk-quantification methods
Tooling

Methods & Platforms

Data Collection

  • LiDAR and UAV photogrammetry
  • Piezometers, inclinometers, strain gauges
  • Vehicle-mounted sensing platforms
  • In-situ testing (CPT, DMT, SPT)
  • Geophysical surveys

Modeling & Simulation

  • PLAXIS, GeoStudio (FEM, LEM)
  • MODFLOW, SEEP/W (groundwater, seepage)
  • Probabilistic analysis
  • Machine learning for predictive analytics
  • Reliability-based frameworks

Data & Delivery

  • ArcGIS, QGIS, PostGIS
  • DIGGS-compliant data management
  • Digital twins and 3D visualization
  • Decision-support dashboards
  • Technical reporting and specification authoring
Clients

Clients & Collaborators

  • 01Local and regional entities
  • 02State agencies and transportation authorities
  • 03Federal agencies and programs
  • 04Universities and research institutions
  • 05Engineering firms
  • 06Industry consortia and technical committees
Technologies

Technologies in development.

Productized capabilities built from NSQ's measurement and quantification work: instruments, pipelines, and data products that carry characterization into the field at scale.

Introduction

Alongside our research and advisory work, NSQ develops technologies that turn measurement methods into repeatable systems. Each applies the same principle as that work: treat what is below and across the ground as something to be quantified directly and defensibly, then deliver that quantification in a form the profession can adopt.

Interested in a technology or pilot.

Contact us
← Technologies
TechnologyIn development
RAIDR
Capture everything of value.

RAIDR is a mobile, multi-sensor data-collection system that inventories a corridor’s geotechnical assets (retaining walls, slopes, and rockfaces) in a single pass at travel speed. Built on sensing proven in agricultural, transportation, and surveying systems, it delivers a georeferenced, screening-level record structured for agency GIS, with the potential subsurface utilities indicated by surface evidence flagged for verification.

The problem

The assets no one has counted.

Most agencies maintain rigorous inventories of their bridges and pavements. Far fewer can say how many retaining walls, slopes, or rockfaces they own: where they are, what they are made of, or what condition they are in. Geotechnical assets sit largely outside the inspection regimes that protect other infrastructure, and the records that do exist are scattered across districts, formats, and decades.

The conventional remedy is a manual inventory: crews, closures, and a snapshot that begins aging the day it is delivered. RAIDR exists to replace that snapshot with a repeatable measurement: a corridor record that can be re-collected as easily as it was collected.

Output

What a pass produces.

  • 01A georeferenced inventory of surface-visible geotechnical assets (retaining walls, slopes, and rockfaces) with corridor position and extent recorded for each.
  • 02Surface-visible utility fixtures recorded alongside them, with the potential subsurface utilities they indicate preliminarily identified and flagged for verification.
  • 03A single-pass record captured at travel speed: no lane closures, no repeat visits, repeatable on any schedule.
  • 04Deliverables structured for direct ingestion: GeoJSON, Esri geodatabase, and DIGGS-compatible exports for agency GIS and asset-management systems.
PASS DIRECTION → W-014 · RETAINING WALL S-007 · SLOPE R-003 · ROCKFACE STA 100+00105+00110+00115+00119+50 INFERRED UTILITY — FLAGGED FOR VERIFICATION SURFACE ASSET UTILITY FIXTURE INFERRED · UNVERIFIED FIG. — SAMPLE CORRIDOR RECORD

Illustrative sample. RAIDR deliverables are screening-level inventories, not boundary surveys, condition ratings, or utility locates.

Position

Where RAIDR fits.

RAIDR is the screening and inventory layer: the pass that establishes what an agency owns, where it stands, and where to look closer. Every record is built to carry forward into the detailed work that follows.

Upstream

Inventory & screeningCounted.

What exists, where it is, and what surface evidence says about it: the starting point for prioritization, not the final word on condition.

Alongside

Asset managementCarried.

Outputs drop into GIS and asset-management systems, giving geotechnical assets the same footing in the data as bridges and pavements.

Downstream

Detailed evaluationBuilt on.

RAIDR records give agencies and owners a current, georeferenced starting point for detailed condition assessments, design, and subsurface utility investigations: the corridor-wide context those efforts otherwise have to assemble first.

Approach

Proven sensing, recombined.

RAIDR does not depend on exotic hardware. It combines sensing technologies proven at scale in agricultural, transportation, and surveying systems, optimized and calibrated together so that a single vehicle, in a single pass, reads the corridor the way three industries already read theirs.

Pilot program

Become a pilot partner.

RAIDR is in active development, and its first deployments will be pilot corridors run with partner agencies and firms. A pilot is deliberately small (one corridor, one pass, one deliverable): enough to evaluate the record against what you already know.

NSQ provides

The instrumented vehicle, the pass, the processing, and a finished deliverable in the formats your systems use.

A partner provides

A corridor of interest, access and permissions to drive it, and, where they exist, existing records to benchmark the deliverable against.

A partner receives

The georeferenced inventory for that corridor, a side-by-side comparison against existing records, and a direct line into what RAIDR becomes next.

Become a RAIDR pilot partner.

Contact us
Experience

Representative experience.

The examples below are representative of geotechnical and geostructural work our staff have performed over the course of their careers, in many cases prior to or independent of NSQ and under other firms' professional licensure. They illustrate the methods and capabilities our team brings to research and advisory engagements.

ClientFederal AgencyInstrumentation

MSE wall performance monitoring.

An instrumentation and data-reduction methodology for evaluating MSE wall performance at the reinforcement-layer scale. Combined strain gauges, inclinometers, vibrating-wire piezometers, and distributed fiber-optic sensing into a unified protocol, with reduced-data results benchmarked against AASHTO LRFD design assumptions.

Protocol developmentDAS / DSS fiber opticAASHTO LRFD
DESIGN = MEASURED FIG. 1 — MEASURED vs DESIGN REINFORCEMENT LOAD
ClientMunicipalityAnalysis

Coupled seepage and stability analysis.

A workflow integrating transient seepage analysis with limit-equilibrium and finite-element slope stability computations, parameterized against inclinometer and piezometer records from instrumented embankments. Delivered as a documented modeling protocol with worked examples.

Framework developmentSLOPE/WSEEP/W
FIELDDATA SEEPAGEMODEL STABILITYANALYSIS FS(t)OUTPUT CALIBRATION LOOP FIG. 2 — COUPLED SEEPAGE–STABILITY WORKFLOW
ClientState AgencyData infrastructure

DIGGS-compliant data infrastructure.

Development and implementation of a subsurface data platform consolidating historic boring logs, laboratory records, and instrumentation into a queryable system. Built the schema, ingestion protocols, QA/QC workflows, and export tooling, delivered alongside user documentation and adoption guidance.

Platform developmentDIGGSPostGISDjango
INTERFACES · QUERY · EXPORT VALIDATION · QA/QC LAYER DIGGS SCHEMA POSTGIS · SPATIAL INDEX DATA STORE · 2,840 BORINGS FIG. 3 — SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE, 5-LAYER
ClientP3Soft-soils analysis

Staged preload settlement and strength-gain analysis.

A coupled consolidation and strength-gain framework for staged preload over soft glaciolacustrine clays: low-plasticity "rock flour" deposits characterized by slow drainage and significant sensitivity. Paired one-dimensional consolidation modeling with CPTu- and vane-shear-based strength assessments to predict settlement, track pore-pressure dissipation, and verify undrained strength progression under sequential load stages. Developed as a coordinated modeling methodology, with instrumentation and acceptance criteria and stage-readiness decision logic for a staged-construction program.

Consolidation modelingStrength gain assessmentStaged constructionInstrumented verification
TARGET sᵤ S1S2S3 PREDICTEDMEASURED FIG. 4 — UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH vs ELAPSED TIME
ClientInfrastructure OwnerModeling

Transient seepage characterization.

A transient groundwater modeling workflow for levee reach analysis under design flood loading, including piezometer-based calibration and spatial variability parameterization. Delivered as a methodology document with a worked example reach and recommended instrumentation specifications.

MethodologyMODFLOWTransient seepage
FLOOD STAGEMODELMEASURED FIG. 5 — TRANSIENT RESPONSE, MODEL vs MEASURED
Contact

Start a conversation.

For project scopes, methodology questions, and teaming or collaboration inquiries.

Get in touch.

Contact us to discuss a project scope, a methodology question, or a potential collaboration. We engage with clients across the United States and welcome teaming arrangements with licensed engineering firms, agencies, and research institutions who engage us for methods development and technical research.

Office
Urbana, Illinois
Hours
Weekdays, 08:00 – 17:00 Central
Reference
N 40°06′47″ · W 88°12′27″
A member of our team will respond within two business days.
Legal

Privacy Policy

How information is collected and used when you visit this site.

Legal

Terms of Use

The terms that govern your use of this website.